BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//ChamberMaster//Event Calendar 2.0//EN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:P3D
REFRESH-INTERVAL:P3D
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART:20180612T170000Z
DTEND:20180612T180000Z
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-ALLDAYEVENT:FALSE
SUMMARY:Employee Misclassification: The Real Impact of the Dynamex Decision
DESCRIPTION:With the rise of the Gig Economy\, many companies have engaged independent contractors to accomplish many tasks previously handled by employees. However\, the California Supreme Court recently broke new ground in providing protections to California workers\, by making it much easier for a worker to qualify as an employee\, subject to the protections of Wage Orders\, as opposed to an independent contractor\, with no such protections. California's Wage Orders set worker protections relating to minimum wage\, maximum hours\, and a limited number of very basic working conditions (such as minimally required meal and rest breaks).\n\n\n\nIn the case of Dynamex Operations W. v. Superior L.A. County\, the Supreme Court adopted a much broader standard\, holding that to "employ" means to "suffer\, or permit to work." The Court held that this definition must be interpreted broadly to treat as "employees\," and thereby provide the wage order's protection to\, all workers who would ordinarily be viewed as working in the hiring business under the new "ABC" test. The new classification standard will make it easier to find liability for misclassifying workers as independent contractors.\n\n\n\nThis is a ruling that could impact thousands of employers who may have misclassified employees. Join us as Klinedinst employment attorneys Susan Chelsea and Patrick Goode review the impact of the Dynamex ruling\, outline the new classification standards that employers must abide by\, and provide real-world guidance to help you ensure full compliance with this wide-ranging ruling.
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:With the rise of the Gig Economy\, many companies have engaged independent contractors to accomplish many tasks previously handled by employees. However\, the California Supreme Court recently broke new ground in providing protections to California workers\, by making it much easier for a worker to qualify as an employee\, subject to the protections of Wage Orders\, as opposed to an independent contractor\, with no such protections. California&rsquo\;s Wage Orders set worker protections relating to minimum wage\, maximum hours\, and a limited number of very basic working conditions (such as minimally required meal and rest breaks).<br />\n<br />\nIn the case of&nbsp\;Dynamex Operations W. v. Superior L.A. County\, the Supreme Court adopted a much broader standard\, holding that to &ldquo\;employ&rdquo\; means to &ldquo\;suffer\, or permit to work.&rdquo\; The Court held that this definition must be interpreted broadly to treat as &ldquo\;employees\,&rdquo\; and thereby provide the wage order&rsquo\;s protection to\,&nbsp\;all&nbsp\;workers who would ordinarily be viewed as&nbsp\;working in the hiring business&nbsp\;under the new &ldquo\;ABC&rdquo\; test. The new classification standard will make it easier to find liability for misclassifying workers as independent contractors.<br />\n<br />\nThis is a ruling that could impact thousands of employers who may have misclassified employees. Join us as Klinedinst employment attorneys Susan Chelsea and Patrick Goode review the impact of the Dynamex ruling\, outline the new classification standards that employers must abide by\, and provide real-world guidance to help you ensure full compliance with this wide-ranging ruling.
LOCATION:Remote webinar
UID:e.784.20359
SEQUENCE:3
DTSTAMP:20260417T131853Z
URL:https://chamber.sdbusinesschamber.com/events/details/employee-misclassification-the-real-impact-of-the-dynamex-decision-20359
END:VEVENT

END:VCALENDAR